The first bill in the new Congress should be an ‘anti-socialism’ bill that everyone can get behind

The first bill in the new Congress should be an ‘anti-socialism’ bill that everyone can get behind

It’s hard to argue that any citizens have been more targeted under the Trump administration than those living in Democratic-led states, which was by Donald Trump’s own vindictive design. Whether it was singling them out for punishment with tax legislation, stealing their medical supplies, holding out disaster relief, or even attacking their citizens with his gestapo forces, Trump and his Republican allies did whatever they could to make blue state citizens suffer. Just recently, Trump even threatened to deny the COVID-19 vaccine to deep-blue New York.

There are a lot of things Joe Biden needs to tackle that have been neglected by the current administration, including health care, the pandemic, climate change, and growing unemployment. If Republicans hold onto the Senate, they will try to roadblock each of these items. With that possibility in mind, I propose that one of the first bills the Biden administration request from Congress is one that Republicans should all jump on: an anti-socialism bill. Here’s a quick summary:

  • Barring a national disaster, no state gets more than 1.5 times what they pay into the federal pot.

  • Every state at least gets back what they put in.

  • There will be no farm subsidies, no universal income, no state banks, no public utilities, no state-owned corporations, and no rural internet subsidies.

What Republican could possibly argue with this?  Turns out, quite a few of them!

For the past four years, I’ve recoiled in horror while a resentful Republican Party, drunk on power, terrorized people residing in Democratic areas. During the COVID-19 crisis, Trump had ventilator shipments seized in blue states so he could redistribute them to red states. Here in Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis received more COVID-19 aid than he asked for, while the governors of Michigan and New York had to fight for what they needed because of Trump’s petty feuding. A shipment of 3 million N95 masks headed for Massachusetts were seized at port, and Maryland’s governor literally had to hide COVID-19 tests at an undisclosed location to keep the Feds from taking them. Worst of all, a life-saving national testing strategy was sabotaged because Jared Kushner believed deaths from the coronavirus would primarily affect blue cities and states. It is unbelievable that genocide was a literal Republican policy in 2020.

Four million acres burned in California in 2020. Mexico sent 100 firefighters to help.

According to former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Chief of Staff Miles “Anonymous” Taylor, when he reported four million acres burning in California, Trump immediately whined about how badly former Gov. Jerry Brown and current Gov. Gavin Newsom had treated him. Trump also railed about California not voting for him in the 2016 election, saying “If they don’t support me, I’m not gonna support them.” Trump ultimately refused to send disaster relief.

The rhetoric against blue states hit a fever pitch after the passage of the CARES Act when Democratic leaders in New York and California were lectured about fiscal responsibility by the likes of Rick Scott and Mitch McConnell—two of the least qualified people in the Senate to speak about such things. Scott, a Florida man who literally got rich by defrauding the government, said it wasn’t fair to reward “liberal politicians in states like New York for their unwillingness to make tough and responsible choices.” Majority Leader McConnell, who went to Washington, D.C. with no money and is now somehow the seventh-richest Senator, insisted that giving any relief to New York was a “blue state bailout.” Further, he said he’d rather states go bankrupt than get aid, and attacked Democratic states as reckless spenders.

Yet here’s the simple, indisputable fact: It’s the blue states who subsidize low-tech, low-tax, red states.

Not only do citizens in Democratic-led states send way more taxes to Washington than their red counterparts, they also receive much less back in federal spending. When aid was being withheld from New York and California, it wasn’t money from taxpayers in Florida or Kentucky that was being “saved.” It was New York’s and California’s own money to which they were prevented from gaining access.

Blue states are getting screwed, and if their senators were smart, they’d beat the GOP to the punch. In 2021, Republicans are going to suddenly pretend they’re deficit hawks under President Joe Biden, even though the deficit increased over $5.2 trillion under the short reign of Trump. The fix Democrats should propose is simple: Stop extravagantly subsidizing the red states.

Republicans have a very long history of calling Democrats “socialists,” and their entire platform seems to be attacking anything the government does to help people as “socialism.” With that in mind, senators from blue states such as New Jersey and New York should introduce an anti-socialism bill in the Senate. The bill should read that any state that has paid more in federal taxes than they received for three consecutive years should be exempted from subsidizing the other states for three years as well. This prevents “maker” states from subsidizing “taker” states. New York and New Jersey are always, without fail, at the top of the list of the “maker” states, followed in some order by California, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Illinois.

New York gets back $.91 for every dollar sent to the federal government, while Kentucky gets back $2.05.

The bill should also forbid any state at any given year from getting more that 1.5 times back than they pay into the system. This would never be a problem for maker states like New York, which currently gets only get $0.91 back for every dollar sent to the federal government. New Jersey only gets $0.82 back. Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell’s Kentucky is among the worst takers. His state gets $2.05 back for every dollar it contributes since the Bluegrass State depends on the federal government to subsidize 38% of its annual revenue. West Virginia gets $2.43 back for every dollar it puts in, while Mississippi gets a whopping 250% return: That’s $2.50 back for every dollar it gives.

That’s both welfare AND socialism! I’d love to see red state leaders defend this, but just to drive home the point, we could have the bill ban socialism at the state and local level: no state-run banks, no government-controlled utilities, no universal income, and no state-owned corporations, just to name a few. Republicans would love that, right?

Although that wouldn’t be an issue with any blue state, you would definitely see strong protests coming from politicians in states you might not have thought of.

  • NEBRASKA: If there was a provision that said all states needed to privatize their electrical grids—like in the blue states—Nebraska would have a fit. Nebraska’s grid and utilities are completely publicly and cooperatively run, and the Nebraska citizens love this bit of socialism! There are no stockholders, and no profit motive, and Nebraska citizens are provided some of the lowest energy and utility rates in the nation. Any excess funds go to state improvements. This has led Nebraska being 10th in the nation for using renewable energies like solar and wind.

  • TENNESSEE: How about Democrats push Donald Trump’s proposal to sell off the Tennessee Valley Authority’s transmission assets to private industry? The TVA is a depression-era project from Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “communist” New Deal. It created a federal corporation to provide navigation, flood control, electricity generation, fertilizer manufacturing, and economic development to the Tennessee Valley. The TVA is highly popular in Tennessee and the surrounding states. In fact, every Republican official went ballistic Trump proposed privatization. Sen. Lamar Alexander, who loved to tout that he stood with the president against socialism, called privatizing the TVA “loony.”

  • NORTH DAKOTA: We can at least agree that no bank should be state-owned, right?  Well, there is one in the U.S., and it’s not in a blue state. At the turn of the 20th century, the Socialist Party of North Dakota briefly held control of the government. During this time, a government-owned bank was created that actively intervenes in private markets when necessary. You’d think right-wing North Dakota Republicans would want to get rid of this, but no! This socialist state bank is critical in supporting the state’s economy. The bank is well-managed, and it answers to citizens instead of shareholders. If that wasn’t enough, the short-lived socialists also built the largest flour mill in the United States, which is also owned by the government. It is overseen by the North Dakota Industrial Commission, whose leaders are elected. It’s so popular that no one suggests privatizing it.

  • ALASKA:  If nothing else, at the very least, surely Republicans can’t argue with banning universal income. Welp. The Alaska Permanent Fund is a socialist wonder, and it’s highly successful. Residents are paid just for living in Alaska, from a (red) state-owned fund established using oil revenue. The argument that a small, universal income stream causes people to not want to work falls apart here. In fact, the income is enough to pay for transportation, child care, and other fixed costs of employment that make it easier for people to get work. Alaskans would positively revolt if this was taken away.

Nebraska is the only state to have a public grid, and generates about one-fifth of its energy through renewable sources like wind and solar.

There are other states that embrace socialist systems and policies, but I think I’ve made my point. Many blue states don’t have much interest in farm price supports, subsidies for land management and forestry, or ensuring internet access to rural areas. For that matter, the overwhelming majority of folks on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)—often referred to as “welfare”—are poor whites—Trump’s base—in dark red, rural areas. This is a truth even Trump refuses to believe.

Yet all of these programs are supported by the blue states. Under the 2017 GOP Tax Scam, new limits were placed on the amount of state and local taxes people could deduct from their federal taxable income. Since people in blue states pay far more state and local taxes than people in red states, blue state taxpayers suddenly had to cough up even more money.

Of course, I’m not serious that we should end any of these valuable programs. I’m fine with the highly educated, tech-savvy blue areas sharing a bit to help out their fellow Americans. But I think it’s time red states stop taking advantage of them. As Keith Olbermann explains, blue state residents are simply not getting their money’s worth.

“Connecticut pays $8 billion more than it gets back. Massachusetts, $9 billion. New Jersey, $12 billion. California, $14 billion. Illinois, $15 billion. New York, $22 billion. All so that the states that cannot fend for themselves can continue to, you know, eat, and send QAnon terror cultists (Rep.-elect Marjorie Greene) and Eagle’s Nest Nazis (Rep.-elect Madison Cawthorn) to the House and Senate.” 

You can only bite the hand that feeds you so many times before you never see that hand again. Blue state senators must demand reform in upcoming budget discussions. No more massive handouts to the red states. No more terrorizing the blue states by electing hatemongers to high positions of power. No more withholding aid to urban areas.

And no more attacks on the election, or the voters in major cities. These folks are subsidizing people who hate them, and they deserve better.  


From Daily Kos at Read More. This article is republished from DailyKos under an open content license. Read the original article at DailyKos.

More News Stories

Loading...

More Political News

Loading...